Legal Opinion

Hannes v. Kingdom of Roumania Monopolies Institute

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

The defendant makes this application solely and exclusively for the purpose of pleading immunity from suit. It seeks an order whereby is decreed the refusal of this court to accept jurisdiction of this action on the ground that the action relates to the public debt of the Kingdom of Roumania, that the sovereign rights of the said kingdom are involved and affected by the action, that the defendant is an agent or instrumentality of the said kingdom, that the Kingdom of Roumania and the defendant as its agent and instrumentality respectfully decline to submit to the juris*545diction of this court,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berizzi Brothers Co. v. SS PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet RepublicNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Bradford v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Menzel v. ListNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Production, Transportation, Refining & Distribution of PetroleumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API