Legal Opinion

Bandy v. Ransom

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition to L. W. Ransom et al., composing the Justices’ Court of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No, 2, Sharpstein, J.:

The petitioner alleges in substance that on the 28th day of December, 1879, he filed his petition in insolvency in the County Court of the City and County of San Francisco. That thereupon the Judge of that Court issued an order for the meeting of creditors, and at the same time made an order that all proceedings against the petitioner be staid. That since said orders were made, certain of the creditors of the petitioner have commenced actions, and obtained judgments in the Justices’ Court of said city and county against the petitioner, and that upon one of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Scannell v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hayne v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Busó v. Borinquen Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  4. Busó v. Borinquen Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  5. Torres v. TorresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API