Legal Opinion
Klein v. Klein
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the orders of Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 21,1989 and October 26, 1989, should be reinstated.
The only aspect of the extended matrimonial dispute between the parties before this Court relates to their former marital residence. The parties entered into a stipulation of settlement, which was not merged into and expressly survived the 1987 divorce judgment. Under the terms of the settlement, appellant former husband was entitled to exclusive occupancy of the marital residence until…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rose v. Spa Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Anostario v. VicinanzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Klein v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel Perla Associates v. 101 Kent Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- IRAKOZE, MARTHA v. SAMBUCO, GENNAROAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Irakoze v. SambucoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Irakoze v. SambucoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Pollack v. PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.