Warrick v. Farley
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Hamilton county: George F. Corcoran, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtHamer, J.
The plaintiff, Myrl A. Warrick, recovered a judgment against the defendant, William I. Farley, in the district court for Hamilton county, for damages by reason of an injury sustained through the bite of defendant’s dog. The defendant appeals.
The defendant objects that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. This involves a consideration of the disposition of the dog, whether to bite mankind, and whether the defendant knew or had reason to believe that his dog had such a disposition. We have read the evidence. It appears that the defendant owned a bulldog. The plaintiff owned a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Le Forest v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Martinez v. BernhardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Bush v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- Hathaway v. TinkhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Smith v. CauseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Netusil v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Goodwin v. E. B. Nelson Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Paulsen v. CourtneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Guzman v. BarthNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hughey v. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.