Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Royston

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1991No. 14500PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, pursuant to Rule 13 of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, 1 certified the following question to this court:

Whether Haw. Rev. Stat. [(HRS)] § 431-448(a) (1985) [Hawaii’s uninsured motorist statute] permits a government employee to recover uninsured motorist benefits for work related injuries, where that employee is statutorily barred by the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq., from prosecuting a tort action against the uninsured tortfeasor?

As a condition precedent to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Barfield v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Sayan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Peterson v. KludtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. O'Dell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Otterberg v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Matarese v. New Hampshire Municipal Ass'n Property-Liability Insurance Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CarltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Peterson v. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  5. Violanda Soledad v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API