Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Healy v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1939No. 5560Published

1Concurrence

By HAMILTON, PJ.

I concur in the judgment of reversal of the court of common pleas.

I am of opinion that the judgment should be reversed'- for. error in the charge of the trial-court in the general charge, wherein the court submitted the question of the violation of the Federal Statutes relating to defective equipment and defective coupler. I •find no evidence of any defective equipment' and no evidence of any defective coupler, directly contributing to decedent’s injury and death.

See: B. & O. Ry. Co. v Tittle, 4 Fed. (2d.) 818, on the question of proximate cause.

The case should be remanded for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KoenneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Louisville & N. R. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. Hines v. LoganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  5. Frazier v. Interstate R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API