Legal Opinion

Curiac v. Abadie

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Second Judicial District, Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Currey, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount due from the defendants to the plaintiff upon a promissory note dated in October, 1862, with interest thereon. The-plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the consideration of the note was gold *503coin of the United States. The prayer of the complaint was for judgment in the amount due on the note and for the costs of the suit, and for such other and further relief as the nature of the case demanded.

The defendants answered alleging that when the note became due they tendered to the plaintiff the amount due thereon in United…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mau v. Hollywood Commercial Buildings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Betts v. ButlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Orth v. Zion's Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API