Legal Opinion

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Baer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1982No. 80-2528, CA A23546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is a workers’ compensation claim under the occupational disease law. ORS 656.802 to 656.824. The issue is the allocation of responsibility between two successive carriers of the same employer. The referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board found SAIF, the initial carrier, liable. We review de novo, ORS 656.298(6), and affirm.

Claimant contracted a compensable occupational disease, allergic contact dermatitis, from his exposure to a chemical (potassium dichromate) used in his work as a printer, his occupation for 26 years. Claimant developed the allergy between October, 1976, and January,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Mathis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Pacific Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Roseburg Lumber Co. v. Louisiana-PacificCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API