Legal Opinion

Meier v. City of Charlotte

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2010No. COA09-1081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Respondents City of Charlotte and the City of Charlotte Zoning Board of Adjustment appeal from an order entered by the trial court finding that Petitioner Jeffrey Meier had filed an appeal to the Board of Adjustment in a timely manner; that the Board of Adjustment had “subject matter jurisdiction to hear Petitioner’s . . appeal;” and that the Board of Adjustment “should not have dismissed Petitioner’s . . . appeal” as untimely and remanding this case to the Board of Adjustment for the purpose of hearing “Petitioner’s application for appeal on the merits as soon as the same may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. Johnston County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Allen v. City of Burlington Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. In the Matter of Society for Preservation of Historic OakwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Water Tower Office Associates v. Town of Cary Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers Park Homeowners Ass'n v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Ashe Cnty. v. Ashe Cnty. Planning Bd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. S.T. Wooten Corp. v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Ashe Cnty. v. Ashe Cnty. Plan. Bd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API