Legal Opinion

United States v. Eduardo Jose Francomano

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 3, 1977No. 76-1228, 76-1229, 76-1232 and 76-1233PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.

Defendants Eduardo Jose Francomano, Mario A. M. Fassani Donoso, Daniel Jose Scodes and Fernando Arias Roghuett have each taken a timely appeal from their conviction by a jury upon an indictment charging them and Hugh MacQueen Boord, Joanne Mentala, and Walter Edwin Martian with violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963, charging that on or about July 22, 1975, in the District of Puerto Rico and elsewhere, defendants, aiding and abetting each other, knowingly and intentionally did attempt to import into the United States from a place outside thereof approximately fifty…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. Ralph Garguilo and Joseph MacChiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Hicks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-PolancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. SerranoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Jose A. Garcia, United States v. Pablo H. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Evelyn SotoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API