Legal Opinion
Schrader v. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1985No. 84-4079PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge:
The issue on appeal is whether officials administering the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in determining eligibility for aid, may count an applicant’s or recipient’s real property interest as “available” regardless of whether it was actually available to meet his or her family's current needs.
Debbie Schrader, acting individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, appeals from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment for the officials administering the program. Schrader alleges that a regulation of the Idaho…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schrader v. Idaho Department Of Health And WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jane Zeien, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Charles M. Palmer, Acting Director of Iowa Department of Human Services v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Zeien v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992