Legal Opinion
Bedford Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Milano
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 27, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
As the responses of the defendant Milano (defendant) to the plaintiffs interrogatory No. 11(a) and the plaintiffs demand for admission No. 12 disclose a disputed question of fact as to whether the plaintiff and the- defendant (parties) entered into the agreement which is set out in par. 5 of the Callahan affidavit, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied unless the defendant could establish that he would be entitled to prevail as matter of law on at least one of the five grounds set out in his motion in the event that the plaintiff should succeed in proving to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Shapiro Equipment Corp. v. Morris & Son Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Cohen v. BaillyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Blair v. CifrinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Greenberg v. WeismanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Srebnick v. Lo-Law Transit Management, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Davidson Pipe Supply Co., Inc. v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Dowse, Inc. v. BrockunierMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992
- Gallagher v. RoachMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
- Choice Health Douglas Investment Group, Inc. v. Devcon Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.