(PS) Moore v. C.F.Y. Development Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLESETTA MOORE. SR., No. 2:25-cv-0034-DAD-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 C.F.Y. DEVELOPMENT INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Charlesetta Moore1 proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis and seeks relief under 18 the Fair Housing Act. This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 4) is before 20 the court for screening. 21 I. Screening Requirement 22 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.