Legal Opinion · Dissent

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Knox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1942Published

1DissentDeviN, J.

Tbe only question raised by this appeal is tbe application of tbe lis pendens statutes (C. S., 500-504). -The pertinent provisions of these statutes are as follows:

*733“In action affecting the title to real property, the plaintiff, at or any time after the time of filing the complaint, . . . may file with the clerk of each County in which the property is situated a notice of the pending of the action, containing the names of the parties, the object of the action, and the description of the property in that County affected thereby” (0. S., 500). “Any party to an action desiring to claim the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Cox v. Wall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Horney v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. MacKorellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Pierce v. . MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API