Legal Opinion
Alli v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 26, 2008No. 01-669-CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
“One picture is worth 1,000 denials.”1
This contract action involves several apartment complexes in the Detroit, Michigan area. Each of them participated, at one point, in a subsidized housing program run by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Under so-called Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contracts, the landlords of properties in the subsidized housing program are required to maintain and operate them to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing. Failure to do so can be considered an event of default and result, inter alia, in the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spectrum Sciences v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Miglionico v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.