Merrick v. Merrick
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Waters v. Waters, 49 Mo. 385, and cases cited ; Wag. Stat., chap. 46, secs. 6, 13. A judgment cannot be attacked for error or irregularity upon a motion to quash an execution issued thereunder. — Judge v. Judge, 38 Mo. 159 ; Harvey v.Tyler, 2 Wall. 328 ; Hendricksonv.Railroad Oo., 34 Mo. 188. Execution under decree for alimony.— Schmidt v. Schmidt, 26 Mo. 235; Waters v. Waters, 49 Mo. 385; FouUe v. Colburn, 48 Mo. 225.
1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.
This case comes here on appeal from the order of the-court below overruling a motion to quash an execution issued upon a decree of divorce and for alimony. The suit, was returnable| to the October term, 1875, of the Circuit Court; a default was taken, and a decree rendered Oct. 29, 1875, in favor of the respondent here, of which the-following is the concluding portion: “And it is further-ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the defendant pay to-plaintiff, for her alimony, and maintenance of her child, the sum of ninety dollars per month, commencing on the fifteenth day of September, 1875, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shorter's Adm'r v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Swinney v. Watkins & RaglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
3Cited by6 opinions
- McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Hammett v. HattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Horstmeyer v. ConnorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Enterprise Furniture & Carpet Outfitting Installment Co. v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Clinkscales v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.