Legal Opinion

Castro v. Federal Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1993No. 89 Civ. 5559 (CHT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge:

Plaintiff Bernadette Castro (“Ms. Castro”) brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1982) and Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. She seeks a declaratory judgment that the defendant, Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”), has a duty to defend and to indemnify her in a legal action pending in the United States Virgin Islands. Ms. Castro is a third party defendant in Whitmer v. Castro Convertible Corp., et al., Civ.No. 1990/27 (D.V.I.) (“the Whitmer action”). She claims that she is entitled to reimbursement from Federal for expenses she has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Comind, Companhia De Seguros v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
  2. Port Ship Service, Inc. v. International Ship Management & Agencies Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Getty Oil Co. v. Norse Management Co.(PTE) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Matter of Uiterwyk Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1987
  5. Port Ship Service, Inc. v. Norton, Lilly & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nomura Securities International, Inc. v. ETrade Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Orion Insurance v. The M/V "Humacao"District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Novocargo USA Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API