United Iron Works v. Wagner
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chelan county, Grimshaw, J., entered June 29, 19.16, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant upon a counterclaim for damages, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to recover the purchase price of a pumping plant. The defendant admitted the contract and counterclaimed for damages, because, as it is alleged' in the answer, the pumping plant was not delivered within a reasonable time, or at all. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant upon his counterclaim in the sum of $1,487.50. From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the plaintiff appeals.
*454The case has been twice tried in the superior court, and this is the second appeal to this court. The opinion upon the former…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harber Bros. v. Moffat Cycle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Ohio Valley Buggy Co. v. Anderson Forging Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Bradley v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Conover v. Neher-Ross Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Skehan v. RummelIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlisle v. HargreavesWashington Supreme Court · 1920