Legal Opinion

T. & N. O. R'y Co. v. Crowder

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1884No. Case No. 1816PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Eeeoe from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.—

This action was brought by Mary Crowder, joined by her present husband, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received through the death of her son by a former husband. She alleged that her son was killed while in the employment of the railway company as a brakeman, and that, his death resulted from the neglect of the company to keep its track in good condition. She also alleged that her son was employed by the company as a brakeman without her consent and against her wish.

There is nothing in the record to show that the wound from which the son died…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. T. & P. R'y Co. v. CarltonTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HennesseyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Texas & N. O. R'y Co. v. CrowderTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. CrowderTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. CrowderTexas Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API