Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1902No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Waite, J. Case by William Johnson against the Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor Eailway for an assault and battery committed by its conductor. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff boarded defendant’s car in Detroit, paid bis fare to Wayne, and received a check or ticket in receipt for it. Conductors were changed before the car reached Wayne, and plaintiff testified that he presented the check given him by the first conductor to the second conductor. The conductor informed plaintiff that the ticket was not good, and, on plaintiff’s refusing to pay his fare, ejected him from the car. A ticket was received in evidence, which the conductor testified was the one in question, and which obviously did not entitle plaintiff to ride from Detroit to Wayne. One of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bryant v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Dwinelle v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Haver v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mayo Hotel Co. v. DancigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Davidson v. Chinese Republic Restaurant Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DowgialloSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Burch v. a & G Associates, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. WillsieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API