Legal Opinion
Wright v. Drury Petroleum Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1924No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWlEST, J.
Plaintiff, claiming to be the holder for value before maturity of the following note, brought this suit against the Drury Petroleum Corporation, J; E. Anderson and Charles G. Walker as makers thereof.
“$10,000. 10/20, 1921.
“Sixty-days after date We promise to pay to the order of Williams Investment Co., Ten thousand & no/100 dollars at their office. Value received. Interest 7%.
“Drury Petroleum Corp.
“Executive Board. J. E. Anderson,
“Due 12/20/21. Chas. G. Walker/’ »
Defendant Anderson by plea, notice and affidavit denied execution of the note otherwise than as an officer of the corporation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reeve v. First National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Phelps v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nutrition Labs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Dormont Savings & Trust Co. v. KommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Saint Joseph Valley Bank v. Napoleon Motors Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.