Vintilla v. United States
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. KENDALL SHARP, District Judge.
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment are before the court for reconsideration. After reviewing the case file and the pertinent law, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion and grants defendant’s cross-motion.
I. Facts
Plaintiff Ray E. Vintilla is a former management employee of Orinoco Mining Company, a Venezuelan subsidiary of the United States Steel Corporation. After Orinoco Mining terminated Mr. Vintilla’s employment, United States Steel paid him a severance benefit known as “cesantía” and “antigüedades”…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weiss v. SawyerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1997
- Bell Consumers, Inc. v. LayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002