Legal Opinion

Vintilla v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 11, 1990No. 87-1107-CIV-ORL-18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

G. KENDALL SHARP, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment are before the court for reconsideration. After reviewing the case file and the pertinent law, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion and grants defendant’s cross-motion.

I. Facts

Plaintiff Ray E. Vintilla is a former management employee of Orinoco Mining Company, a Venezuelan subsidiary of the United States Steel Corporation. After Orinoco Mining terminated Mr. Vintilla’s employment, United States Steel paid him a severance benefit known as “cesantía” and “antigüedades”…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weiss v. SawyerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Bell Consumers, Inc. v. LayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API