Legal Opinion

Herald Square South Civic Ass'n v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola Soto, J.), entered March 31, 2003, dismissing the complaint in an action seeking, inter alia, to enjoin defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Ed) from proceeding with the construction of an electric substation until it had satisfied certain environmental impact requirements, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered March 27, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The court correctly held that Con Ed is not constrained from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witter v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Nature Conservancy v. CongelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Brady v. Genesee & Wyoming RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Hoy v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF BAYVILLEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. Albino v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Perrin v. Bayville Village BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Fink v. GrobartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API