Legal Opinion
Brady v. Genesee & Wyoming Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: We reject petitioners’ contention that the land condemned by respondent, The Genesee and Wyoming Railroad Company (Railroad), for the construction of a railroad spur to the proposed new Akzo Nobel salt mine in the Hampton Corners area will not serve a public use, benefit or purpose (see generally, Clarke v Blackmar, 47 NY 150, 156-157; Stanley v Jay St. Connecting R. R., 182 App Div 399, 402-403, affd 227 NY 639). We likewise reject the contention that the Railroad’s determination and findings must be annulled because the Railroad failed to comply with the State Environmental…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- East Thirteenth Street Community Ass'n v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Clarke v. . BlackmarNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Stanley v. Jay Street Connecting RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Stanley v. . the Jay Street Connecting RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Herald Square South Civic Ass'n v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003