Legal Opinion

Ryland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 2004No. 1D03-4976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolf, C.J.

Appellant, Waty Ryland, appeals from the denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief which asserted nine grounds. The trial court summarily denied the motion, holding that all claims were either procedurally barred or conclusively refuted by the record. We affirm as to all but one of the grounds raised.

Appellant’s seventh ground alleged that his trial counsel failed to file a notice of expiration of speedy trial time and that his trial occurred well after the 175-day period prescribed by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. He also alleged that his co-defendants were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Remak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. McDuffie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Pita v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API