McDuffie v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Tavares McDuffie challenges the lower court’s summary denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief in which he contended that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to discharge him when the state improperly filed an amended information after expiration of the time for speedy trial. See Pezzo v. State, 903 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); State v. D.A., 939 So.2d 149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); State v. Clifton, 905 So.2d 172 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). We reverse and remand, finding that the appellant stated a legally sufficient basis for relief in his motion.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CliftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BradySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Pezzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Bittick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. D.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDuffie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012