Legal Opinion

Walker v. Norris

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Quo warranto; from Johnson superior court. Before Judge Rawlings.

1Per curiam

According to the ruling made in Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. State, 69 Ga. 524, which was followed in Sayer v. Harding, 118 Ga. 642 (45 S. E. 418), a judgment overruling a demurrer to an application for the writ of quo warranto is not a final disposition of the case, from which a bill of exceptions can be taken directly to this court.

2. Under the rulings made in the cases above cited, the bill of exceptions in the present casé was prematurely sued' out, and therefore the writ of error must be dismissed; but inasmuch as such rulings seem to constitute an exception to the general practice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Sayer v. HardingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Denham v. State Highway BoardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API