Idaho Forwarding Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
ZaNe, C. J.;
The respondent alleged in its complaint that on the 1st' day of February, 1889, in consideration of $40.20 paid as premium, its stock of goods at Hailey, Idaho, was insured in the sum of $2,000 by appellant, for one year from the 13th day of the same month, and that on the 2d day of the following July the goods were destroyed by fire. The plaintiff relies upon a contract in prcesenti, not a contract to thereafter insure. Albert Kiesel, who had an interest in plaintiffs business, and manager thereof, testified that B. M. Mallory, the agent of both parties, said to him about the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Commercial Mutual Marine Insurance v. Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Putnam v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- O'Reilly v. . Corporation London AssuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCabe Bros. v. Aetna InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- K. C. Working Chemical Co. v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Preston v. LambUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- American Can Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Meyers v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.