Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. Leland

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1847PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Assumpsit upon a promissory note. The original writ was signed by I. B. Person, as justice of the peace, and a recognizance for costs was taken by him in common form, and the writ, for want of a proper officer, seasonably to be had, was directed'to Silas Bruce, Jr., an indifferent person, to serve and return; and the return showed that it was served by Bruce by attaching real and personal property of the defendants. The writ was indorsed “ Stoughton & Person, Att’ys.”

Read the full summary

Assumpsit upon a promissory note. The original writ was signed by I. B. Person, as justice of the peace, and a recognizance for costs was taken by him in common form, and the writ, for want of a proper officer, seasonably to be had, was directed'to Silas Bruce, Jr., an indifferent person, to serve and return; and the return showed that it was served by Bruce by attaching real and personal property of the defendants. The writ was indorsed “ Stoughton & Person, Att’ys.” The suit was entered in court, and the defendant Leland appeared and pleaded in abatement, “that the service of “said writ…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.

This action was originally commenced to the county court at the November Term, 1844. The writ was signed by I. B. Person, Justice of the Peace, and was directed in the usual 'form to Silas Bruce, Jr., an indifferent person, to serve and return, for the want of a proper officer seasonably to be had, and was served by him on the defendants, by attaching certain personal and real estate. The names of Stoughton & Person, attorneys, were endorsed on the back of the writ, as attorneys for the plaintiffs. The defendant, at the first term of the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte KelloggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  2. Pearson v. FrenchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Rutherford v. MoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Town of St. Johnsbury v. GoodenoughSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  4. Magoon v. Lord-Young Engineering Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Morse v. NashSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API