Legal Opinion

Magoon v. Lord-Young Engineering Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1914No. 787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Per curiam

The court, of its own motion, requested counsel to appear and present their views with reference to the matter of the qualification of Mr. Justice Watson to- sit and partake in the hearing and decision of the appeal in this case.

The original complaint was filed in the court below on March 4, 1914. On March 5, a demurrer was interposed by the defendant, Lord-Young Engineering Company, Limited, which was signed “Thompson, Wilder, Watson & Lymer. F. W. M. and Fred W. Milverton” as attorneys for the said defendant. Later, other pleadings were filed which were signed in the same manner. Mr. Watson…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. East Rome Town Co. v. CothranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Ingraham v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  4. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Love v. LoveHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BROWN v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. MidkiffHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In re Hawaii Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API