Carlon v. Dixon
Oregon Supreme Court
Douglas County. Plaintiff appeals. The material facts are stated iu the opinion;
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
One Britt brought an action in a Justice’s Court against the plaintiff for the recovery of a certain horse. He • filed the necessary affidavit, and gave the required bond, with the defendants as sureties, and by indorsement on the- affidavit required and directed the sheriff to take the horse described in the affidavit from the plaintiff and to deliver it to him. Without further detail it is sufficient to state' that the result of this action terminated adversely to Britt. An execution having been issued, it was returned by the officer, nulla bona. This *146action was then brought in the Circuit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morse v. HodsdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Persse v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Johnson v. WeatherwaxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Strong v. DanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- State ex rel. Cantwell v. StarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Malone v. Addison Insurance Marketing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002