Legal Opinion
Mann-Tankersly Drug Co. v. Cheairs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 10, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Antonio B. Grace, Judge. Appellee was- guilty of contributory negligence. 10 Am. & .Eng. Enc. Law, 272; 14 Cyc. 1087; 66 la. 708; 94 la. 656, 14 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 115, 117; 2 Bibb, 605; I Ark. 31. If means of knowledge are alike accessible to both, they must be deemed to have relied on their own knowledge. 11 Ark. 58; 16 Ark. 528; 26 Ark. 28; 30 Ark. 686; 31 Ark. 170; 47 Ark. 148; 27 Ark. 250; 40 Mass. 256.
1Opinion of the Court
.Battle J.
The complaint in this action was filed on April 24, 1902, and states among other things:
“The plaintiffs, J. T. Cheairs, Sr., and J. T. Cheairs, Jr., were doing business at Winchester, Ark., as partners under the firm-name of J. T. Cheairs & Son; and that thé defendant,MannTankersly Drug Company, a corporation engaged in the drug business -at Pine Bluff, Ark., sold and delivered to plaintiffs at Winchester on the........day of.........., 1902, five cases of vaccine virus, known as blackleg virus, which is made and prepared for vaccinating cattle, commonly cows, to prevent and avoid a…
2Cited by8 opinions
- McLane v. Kirby & SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Fisher v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Ahrens v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Rousset v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Villegas v. Shane-Michael Optical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.