Legal Opinion

Newman v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1948No. Appeal, 155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiffs are commercial photographers. For a number of years they have occupied the entire eighth floor of a building on Penn Avenue, in Pittsburgh. They become liable to the tenant of the floor below for water damage to Ms property and settled the claim by payment of $900. This action was brought by them to recoup their loss, upon a policy of indemnity insurance issued by defendant company. At the close of defendant’s case it was conceded by both parties that the controlling issue involved a construction of the insurance contract and raised a question wholly of law.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hagarty v. Wm. Akers, Jr., Co., Inc.Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commercial Stand. Ins. Co. v. Gilmore, Gardner & Kirk Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Holliday v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Speca v. Bucci Const. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Service Trucking Co. v. American Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newman v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Mullen v. Travelers Indemnity Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1974
  3. Newman v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API