Legal Opinion

Kmart Corp. v. County of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 2002No. C7-01-446, C9-01-447, C0-01-448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

OPINION

This consolidated property tax appeal raises the question of the sufficiency of income information relator provided pursuant to MinmStat. § 278.05, subd. 6(a) (2000), the 60-Day Rule. The tax court ruled that the income information provided within the statutory deadline was insufficient and dismissed relator’s chapter 278 petitions for failure to comply with the statute. We affirm.

Relator Kmart Corporation filed chapter 278 petitions on March 31, 2000, contesting the 1999 assessed value of three leased properties operated by Kmart in St. Louis County, Minnesota: a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kmart Corp. v. County of BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Kmart Corp. v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kmart Corp. v. County of BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. 78th Street OwnerCo, LLC v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Kmart Corp. v. County of BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Kmart Corp. v. County of BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API