Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Marylanders for Fair Representation, Inc. v. Schaefer

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 15, 1992No. Civ. Nos. S-92-510, S-92-1409Published

1ConcurrenceSmalkin, District Judge

I concur in the result of the majority’s opinion denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss this case. I believe, however, that this Court should refrain from exercising any adjudicative function in this case until after the Maryland Court of Appeals will have completed the review of the Governor’s redistricting plan it is mandated to conduct under the Maryland Constitution.

The primacy of state judiciaries, with respect to redistricting issues, was recognized by the Supreme Court in Scott v. Germano, 381 U.S. 407, 85 S.Ct. 1525, 14 L.Ed.2d 477 (1965). There, the Court observed that “[t]he…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API