Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 227-3401PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of First Supreme Judicial District. Suit by R. B. Haynes against the Western Union Telegraph Company. Judgment for plaintiff was reversed and judgment rendered for defendant by the Court of Civil Appeals (212 S. W. 260), and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, J.

R. B. Haynes, plaintiff in error, was indebted to the City National Bank of San Antonio in the sum of $3,000 evidenced by note and secured by the deposit as collateral of certain shares of the capital stock of the Sealey Mattress Company, of the alleged value of $6,000.

Some time in October, 1908, the San Antonio Bank agreed with Haynes and the Sealey National Bank of Sealy to hold the note until November 1, 1908.

■ C. T. Sanders, cashier of the Sealy Bank, subsequently, for a valuable consideration, agreed with Haynes that he would procure or furnish the money to take up the loan, and notified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luckett v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Williams v. TalbotTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lang v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Kirk v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kent v. National Supply Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Gohlman v. GriffithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Taylor v. BanksTexas Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API