Legal Opinion
Kinzer v. Schuckmann
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 7, 2012No. 1:11-CV-00168PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Officer Russell Schuckmann’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 13), Plaintiff Janie Kinzer’s response in opposition (doc. 14), and Defendant’s reply (doc. 18). For the reasons explained below, we DENY Defendant’s motion
I. Background
The uncontested facts in this cause of action are relatively straightforward. A heavy rain fell on June 12, 2010 in Green Township, Ohio (Schuckmann Dep. at 34, doc. 17). Around noon, Plaintiff Janie Kinzer received…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parma v. OdoleckiOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Conneaut v. StanisOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Robert Shreve v. Franklin Cnty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Robert Shreve v. Franklin Cnty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014