Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Quiroz
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 7, 2022No. 20-06001Unknown
1Opinion
er a ON ‘S/ Oe: - WL ame gi [7 os, LQS@ S&S □□□ OF ow UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON 1050 SW SIXTH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 G MeRUTIRICK 503 2613 KATIE DEVLIN LAW CLERK TONIA McCOMBS LAW CLERK February 7, 2022 Rachel Wolf 370 Meyers St. South Salem, OR 97302 Gregory J. Christensen P.O. Box 2039 Corvallis, OR 97339 Re: In re Godofredo Lee Quiroz, Case 19-63163-pcem7 Wolf v. Quiroz, Adv. P. 20-6001-pem Dear Ms. Wolf and Mr. Christensen: The purpose of this letter is to rule on two post-trial motions filed by Plaintiff. For the reasons discussed below, both motions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- All Hawaii Tours, Corp. v. Polynesian Cultural CenterDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1987
- Elmer H. Thomassen v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Creditor's Committee v. Mac Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bobby R. Butler v. Darce French, D/B/A Darce French Trucking Company, and Don C. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.