Legal Opinion
Fifield v. HM Life Insurance C o .
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 28, 2012No. CV-11-201-JLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Fifield v . HM Life Insurance C o . CV-11-201-JL 9/28/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Susan Fifield v. Civil N o . 11-cv-201-JL Opinion N o .
2012 DNH 176
HM Life Insurance C o . et a l . O R D E R This case arises out of an employee’s claim for disability benefits due to abdominal pain, depression, and anxiety. Plaintiff Susan Fifield brought suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),
29 U.S.C. §§ 1001
et seq., against her disability insurer, HM Life Insurance C o . (“HM Life”), its former claims administrator, Broadspire Services Inc.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Ellis v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Orndorf v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.