Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Hon. Chas. Hays Brown, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

The complainant herein is a grandson of the late Volney F. Gossett. Mr. Gossett and his grandson were on affectionate terms, and the grandfather bought an interest in an insurance and real estate business at Knoxville for his grandson. Mr. Gossett took no active part in the management of this business himself, but the partnership continued for several mopths.

In November, 1915, Mr. Flenniken, one of the partners, undertook to buy out the interests of the other two partners. On November 18, 1915, he concluded an arrangement with Mr. Gossett, whereby he bought the latter’s interest in the firm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. CheathamTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BalfourTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Carland v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1801
  4. Ford v. CottrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Braasch v. BondeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Patterson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  3. Trew v. OgleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. DeSoto Hardwood Flooring Co. v. Old Dominion Table & Cabinet WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kivett v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API