Legal Opinion

DeSoto Hardwood Flooring Co. v. Old Dominion Table & Cabinet Works

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Ota February 21, I960, the King-Haase Furniture Company, of Memphis, became indebted to the O'ld Dominion Table and Cabinet Works, a corporation engaged in business in Portsmouth, Virginia., in the sum of $1887 for merchandise. On February 24, 1930, for a valuable consideration, the Old Dominion Table and Cabinet Works assigned this claim to the Manufacturers’ Finance Company of Baltimore, Maryland. Notice of this assignment was not given to the King-Haase Furniture Company until July 11,1980, which was eleven days after the DeSoto Hardwood Flooring Company, a creditor of the 0'ld Dominion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Watkins Ex Rel. Watkins v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Dillingham v. Traders' Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bagwell v. McTigheTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Peters v. GoetzTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  2. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Utility Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  3. Kivett v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  4. Brown v. P'poolCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Fugate v. Carter County Bank (In Re Webb)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API