Legal Opinion

United States of America v. Daniel Levi Magness

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 2026No. 6:26-cv-00128Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff/Respondent, ) ) Crim. Case No. CR-24-58-RAW v. ) ) Civ. Case No. CV-26-128-RAW DANIEL LEVI MAGNESS, ) ) Defendant/Movant. ) ORDER Now before the court is the pro se motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (“§ 2255 motion”) filed by Defendant Daniel Levi Magness. [CR Doc. 102; CV Doc. 1]. Also before the court is a brief in support of the § 2255 motion. [CR Doc. 105]. The Government filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s § 2255 motion. [CR Doc.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Foster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API