Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Greenberg, Formato & Einiger, LLP v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Greenberg, Formato & Einiger, LLP (the “Abrams Firm”) brings this action against defendant Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (“Lloyd’s”) for, inter alia, a declaration that Lloyd’s is obligated to defend and (potentially) indemnify the Abrams Firm in certain underlying actions against the firm pursuant to a professional liability insurance policy (the “Policy”) with Lloyd’s. The parties cross-move for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”). For the reasons below,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Maroney v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harleysville Worcester Insurance Co. v. SharmaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Wachtel Missry LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Huang & Associates, P.C. v. Hanover Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York v. Arrowood Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022