Legal Opinion

Lamarre v. Lamarre

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The validity of the trial court's order depends upon the evidence before it. That evidence has not been transferred. No findings appearing which make the order improper, all special findings necessary to justify it were presumably made. There is no presumption that special findings reported include all the findings made. It must affirmatively appear that they do before the question whether they are sufficient to sustain the general verdict or order can be considered. Spaulding v. Mayo, 81 N.H. 85. It follows that so far as the record here shows, the court's duty in determining what justice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. MayoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
  2. Petition of BurnhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  3. Currier v. SilkeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
  4. Gianaris v. MangurianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  5. Rand v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. LinscottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  2. Vidal v. Errol\Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API