Legal Opinion

Gianaris v. Mangurian

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In the absence of brief or argument for the plaintiff, no error is apparent in the exclusion of evidence, and the exceptions thereto are overruled. Barsantee v. Hartford, 73 N. H. 616; Drake v. Insurance Co., 78 N. H. 604.

As to the other exceptions, none of the evidence is transferred. It is therefore impossible to say what the evidence tended to show relative to the defendant’s duty and liability, and it cannot be told from the case or its amendment whether the requests, either all or some, should have been granted. It does not appear whether they were applicable to the evidence. Since…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamarre v. LamarreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API