Legal Opinion

Flores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1974No. S.F. 23063PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

In 1971 the California Legislature established the Uninsured Employers Fund (Fund) to serve as an immediate source of funds for injured workmen whose employers have failed or refused either to obtain workmen’s compensation insurance or to qualify as self-insurers. Under the newly adopted statutory scheme, if an uninsured employer 1 fails, within 10 days of an award, either to begin payments under the award or to post a sufficient bond, a worker may obtain payment from the state-financed Uninsured Employers Fund, which then is subrogated to the worker’s claim, and proceeds…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rexstrew v. City of Huntington ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ebert v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District v. MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API