Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 31, 1984No. 7407PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Following a jury trial, Hugh Harrison was convicted of importing alcohol into the village of St. Mary’s in violation of AS 04.11.496(b). On appeal, Harrison challenges the constitutionality of Alaska’s local option law, arguing that it violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the United States and Alaska Constitutions and the privacy clause of the Alaska Constitution. Harrison also challenges his conviction on ex post facto grounds. After reviewing Harrison’s claims, we conclude that his conviction must be affirmed.

In order to place Harrison’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sampson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Frat. Order of Eagles v. Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Azzarella v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Burnor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  5. McCracken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API