Legal Opinion

Jamieson & McFarland v. Heim

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1906No. 6109PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered November 20, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action by the indorsee of a draft to enforce payment against the drawer.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action brought to recover upon a bank draft for $375, drawn by the appellants upon their correspondent at T'acoma, Washington, and held by the respondent under the indorsement of the payee named therein. The facts out of which the controversy arises are in substance these: In December, 1904, a person representing himself to be James Grosson presented to the appellants, who are bankers doing business at South Bend, in this state, a draft drawn by a Michigan bank upon a Mew York bank, payable to James Grosson, and offered to sell the same to them. The officers of the bank, being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yakima Valley Bank v. McAllisterWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scandinavian American Bank v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Defiance Lumber Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. United States v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Uriola v. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Goodfellow v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API