Legal Opinion

In Re Special Grand Jury 89-2

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1998No. 98-1073PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a district court order releasing, for use in a civil case, transcripts of the grand jury testimony of potentially all witnesses who testified before the grand jury, based on a showing of need for the testimony of only three witnesses. 1 We reverse the district court’s decision, holding that: (1) a district court must evaluate the need for disclosure of grand jury testimony on a witness-by-witness basis; and (2) before releasing transcripts, the district court must • conduct an in camera review in order to limit the disclosure to the claimed need and make appropriate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Boone v. Carlsbad Bancorporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Grand Jury Matter. Appeal of Nicholas CataniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. In Re Sealed Case No. 98-3077Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. In re: App. Cmte. of the JudiciaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Doe v. CabreraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API