Legal Opinion
Altman v. Altman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 13, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
8 N.J. Super. 301 (1950)
72 A.2d 536
LILLY K. ALTMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARRY ALTMAN AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided April 13, 1950.
Mr. Solomon Lautman, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Feld & Breitner (Mr. Samuel B. Feld), attorneys for defendants.
BIGELOW, J.A.D.
This action is brought on a contract dated February 27, 1940, between the defendants Rose Altman and Harry, her husband, as the party of the first part, and Harry's brother Samuel, and Lilly, his wife, as the party of the second part:
"In the event the party of the first part shall sell the hotel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Second Nat. Bank of Paterson v. CurieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Norton v. NathansonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
- Phillips v. PhillipsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
- Gillette v. BallardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
- Hoyt v. Bridgewater Copper Mining Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1847
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paley v. Barton Savings and Loan Assn.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Dopp v. YariDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Soloff v. JosephsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Cramer v. WeithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952